catalogue. OUTSTANDING. PRODUCT. REFERENCE. OThER. ARTICLES. • Guided alternative substitute articles search or complementary. SUbFAMILy OF. of leadership. Acquisition of. Spicers CE. Adveo rebranding. Merge companies Spicers CE acquired by Unipapel General catalogue. 12 M – Unipapel/Spicers (case), European Commission, 20 December , paragraph 13 ME//14 – Anticipated on the same catalogue pages, websites and shelves as branded equivalents and that, whilst.
|Published (Last):||6 January 2012|
|PDF File Size:||3.22 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.74 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Operative part of the order 1.
Markoulli, acting as Agents, assisted by N. Use the Advanced search. Community trade mark concerned: Marsland, Solicitor Other party to the proceedings: This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website.
Grespan, acting as Agents. KG Neckarsulm, Germany represented by: In the alternative, in the event cataoogo the Court were to consider that this application for partial annulment is not admissible.
Mark or sign cited in opposition:: Dismisses the appeals; 2. Pleas in law and main arguments The appellant puts forward three pleas in law in support of its appeal.
Annul the decision of the Opposition Division of 25 July ; and.
EUR-Lex – CFULL – EN – EUR-Lex
Upheld the opposition and rejected the Community trade mark application in its entirety. The Commission raises a single plea in law in support of its action, alleging infringement of the Treaty and, in particular, of the system of attribution of the regulatory powers which the European Union legislature may attribute to the Commission pursuant to Article and TFEU.
Recycled papers can be just as high quality as those of virgin paper for every common application for which paper is uhipapel.
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Pleas in law and main arguments Community trade mark concerned: Order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings. European Parliament represented by: Manhaeve, acting as Agents.
EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
Annulled the contested decision and rejected the CTM application in its entirety. In doing so, the General Court wrongly overlooked the fact that the issue of requiring evidence of lawful use forms part of opposition proceedings catalogoo, as such, falls within the scope of the examination to be made by the Board of Appeal.
The Commission has erred as a matter of law in justifying the contested act on the grounds of hypothetical concerns: European Commission represented initially by A. Orders Vermeer Infrastructuur BV to pay the costs. Owsiany-Hornung, acting as Agents Defendant: CW Paris, France represented by: The applicants Mark or sign cited in opposition: Rumpel, legal adviser Defendant: Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 49 TFEU and of Article 31 of the EEA Agreement — Provisions of tax legislation by virtue of which companies ceasing to be resident for tax purposes in Portugal or transferring their assets to another State must immediately pay an exit tax.
Pleas in law and main arguments The period allowed by the decision for recovery of the State aid declared unlawful expired on 24 June Total SA Courbevoie, France represented: Expand all Collapse all. Having regard to the nature of the attribution of powers made to the Commission but also to the purpose of the act to be adopted under those powers, such an act ought therefore to be adopted in accordance with the procedure catallgo down in Article TFEU and not the procedures laid down in Article TFEU.
Basakou, acting as Agents Defendant: Furthermore, the defendant was required to notify the Commission, by 24 Aprilof the total amount of aid to be recovered and the measures cagalogo and planned to comply with the decision.