LEY 22285 PDF

The appellant alleged that Article 45 of the Broadcasting Law (Ley de .. Por lo que el párrafo primero del Art. 45 de la ley y las normas dictadas en su. , Spanish, Book edition: Radiodifusión: marco regulatorio: Ley nacional de radiodifusión 22,, Decreto reglamentario /81 / [Claudio] Schifer. (Law of , InfoLEG, available at (Gustavo Ybarra, El kirchnerismo logró aprobar en general la nueva ley de medios, DIARIO LA.

Author: Meztitilar Fenrira
Country: Solomon Islands
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Science
Published (Last): 16 February 2006
Pages: 421
PDF File Size: 15.46 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.92 Mb
ISBN: 427-7-17390-407-1
Downloads: 81149
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Faedal

ALFONSÍN by Maria Belen Repetto on Prezi

Forced cadenas nacionales of a political nature have been strongly criticized by some media outlets, as in some cases it requires them to broadcast opinions that differ from their normal editorial stances. Decision of May 2, Consequently, if it is considered that the presentation 22258 the theatrical work in question could entail the applicability of Article This is why the limitation imposed by the challenged legal provisions is unjustified and constitutes a clear violation of the right to freedom of association, as it imposes the end for which people will legally associate, without there being a sufficient justification for sustaining an imposition which prevents certain non-profit organizations from conducting an activity which is in essence of a cultural nature.

This section highlights some court decisions that have expressly or implicitly taken account of international standards protecting freedom of expression. The Rapporteur hopes that this attitude will prevail among other let in the hemisphere.

La “Legitimidad” Del Enunciador Juridico en la Ley de Radiodifusion Argentina (22285/80) (Report)

Radio stations also carry La Hora Nacionalan hour-long radio program aired on Sunday nights, as part of this requirement. The participation of a mutual association in a bidding process with the aim of acquiring a broadcasting license, if it is selected from amongst the bidders, promotes the diversity of opinions which defines ,ey democratic society, and constitutes a true balance to economic groups.

From to Maythere have been cadenas nacionales in Argentina, including 17 in the first five months of Regarding issue a it is important to note that given that the funds of the parties whether they have a public or private source are, by constitutional mandate Article 96, paragraph 3 of the National Constitution subject to the principles of publicity and transparency, the number of current accounts, their movement and leu in the commercial banks of the state, private banks or any financial entity are of public interest, and therefore, can be accessed by any person.


The selection has been somewhat arbitrary, both for reasons of space and for lack of sufficient information.

Depending on the country, the characteristics of cadenas nacionales vary. After the dictatorship of Alfredo Stroessner —89the use of cadenas nacionales was banned after the system was abused by the military to transmit propaganda. Article 11 of the Convention further recognizes the protection of the right to privacy and dignity, stating that: In conclusion, and in light of the foregoing, the right to the protection of the honor of the plaintiff has not been violated, as we understand that the journalist, Mr.

Cadena nacional

It lacks the legitimacy that should come from the production site, since it wasn’t promulgated by any democratic institution. The Board of Directors of the Bank denied Representative Arce Salas access to the requested information, on the grounds that such information was protected by bank secrecy and the right to privacy.

Sixth and last, and summarizing the foregoing conclusions, if an informer has legitimately exercised his right to freedom of expression, the conclusion that a violation to the right to the protection of honor has been committed cannot be validly reached. As a second point, there is no doubt that there are many other cases that could have been summarized in this report. Dublinsky, of a series of articles portraying the claimant’s involvement in acts of corruption such as requesting the payment of a bribe, and awarding state benefits to his personal acquaintances.

The aforesaid rule has as an exception that operates in the case that there is unequivocal evidence that a political party has transferred part of its private funds to 22285 privately-owned company. The Appeals Court of Santiago de Chile rejected the appeal on the grounds that its admittance would have amounted to prior censorship, banned by Article 13 of the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights.


In some countries, including Argentina and Venezuela, all stations are mandated to air these messages similar le nature to Emergency Action Notifications in the United States. Facts ldy the case. The constitutional provision is in perfect agreement with international human rights norms which guarantee the right to freedom of expression. Therefore, if the appeal were admitted and the subsequent exhibitions of the piece which has given rise to it prohibited, this Court would incur in a form of prior censorship, which is forbidden to this Court.

Texto completo de la Ley Nº , de Radiodifusión | El Cronista

Report on the Situation of Human Rights in Mexico. Article 45 of Law No. Por favor, activar JavaScript para ver este sitio de web.

Massera and Albano Harguindeguy. The organization of this section takes account, as it must, of the standards arising from interpretation of Article 13 of the Convention, which declares that:.

InPresident Rafael Correa ordered Ecuador’s television stations to broadcast cadenas nacionales over the course 22258 the year, the highest such figure in the region and 92 more than Venezuela in the same year. In 22285 to illustrate this idea, the Commission pointed out that Article 29 of the American Convention states that “No provision of this Convention shall be interpreted as: In this way, by writing the theatrical piece and making it public by presenting it, the authors and other people who were involved in this production and presentation exercised their right to freedom of expression, which cannot be subject to prior censorship by any organ, notwithstanding the responsibilities which lry arise by the commission of offenses or abuses during its creation or representation, or of the measures that might be taken in the case portrayed by Article Case of April 16,